How
will Mitt win the foreign policy debate? Mitt will show how Obama’s weakness in Pakistan,
Libya, Syria, Egypt, Palestine, North Korea, Iran, Lebanon, Cameroon, Thailand,
Lichtenstein, East Timor, Anglia, Kenya, Poland, Bermuda, The Cayman Islands, etc., has severely damaged
America’s stellar reputation as world leader.
“Obama
will gracelessly brag about taking down Bin Laden,” Mitt said, angrily. “Obama didn’t do that.
The Seals did that. A real
president would have shot Bin Laden all by himself, danced on his corpse on a
battleship, then later in the Rose Garden.”
Mitt gave me the inside scoop the other day when he and I were running with the wolves at the Central Park Zoo. Mitt also told me that Obama had maliciously squandered the many gains made under George W. Bush’s leadership.
Mitt gave me the inside scoop the other day when he and I were running with the wolves at the Central Park Zoo. Mitt also told me that Obama had maliciously squandered the many gains made under George W. Bush’s leadership.
“Obama should have put boots on the ground in Pakistan, too,” Mitt said, barely
suppressing his contempt.
“I would have committed 500,000 troops in Pakistan to get Bin Laden. Then, I would have sent 100,000 more to
secure the compound in Benghazi, Libya, another 200,000 to Syria to do whatever needs to be done there, and sprinkled
another 600,000 around the world to teach real respect for American values.”
“I
would have bombed Iran, too, of course,” he added. “And North Korea, too, of
course.” Of course, I agreed. That goes without saying.
When
I asked Mitt if he was concerned about adding a couple more trillion to the
deficit with all these boots on the ground, he reminded me, a little curtly,
that “when it comes to American values, no price is too high to pay.”
I
had to agree with him on that one.
Liberty, you know.